The opinions expressed here are those of the authors, not the Georgetown Federalist Society. Contact us at gulcfedsoc@gmail.com
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Views on Georgia v. Randolph?
I have deleted my original post to help make more immediately visible Galen's post about TOMORROW evening's event featuring Judge Silberman. It should be a delightful occasion for Federalists and non-Federalists alike! Hope to see you there!
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Actually, their "married" status was not relevant in the case. Souter refers to them as "co-tenants" or "occupants." (In fact, the marriage was clearly dissolving and the estranged wife had only just returned to the home for a brief period when the cops initiated the search at issue.)
Terima kasih sudah mengizinkan saya untuk berkomentar disini, artikel anda sangat bagus sekali. izinkan kami untuk menshare nya ke web kami di jual obat pembesar penis atas izinnya kami haturkan terima kasi, semoga situs anda dan kami semakin maju dan berada di peringkat pertama google.
The Federalist Society is an intellectual network of conservative and libertarian lawyers, judges, professors, and law students committed to individual freedom, separation of powers, and the rule of law.
2 comments:
Actually, their "married" status was not relevant in the case. Souter refers to them as "co-tenants" or "occupants." (In fact, the marriage was clearly dissolving and the estranged wife had only just returned to the home for a brief period when the cops initiated the search at issue.)
Terima kasih sudah mengizinkan saya untuk berkomentar disini, artikel anda sangat bagus sekali. izinkan kami untuk menshare nya ke web kami di jual obat pembesar penis
atas izinnya kami haturkan terima kasi, semoga situs anda dan kami semakin maju dan berada di peringkat pertama google.
Post a Comment