Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Views on Georgia v. Randolph?

I have deleted my original post to help make more immediately visible Galen's post about TOMORROW evening's event featuring Judge Silberman. It should be a delightful occasion for Federalists and non-Federalists alike! Hope to see you there!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Actually, their "married" status was not relevant in the case. Souter refers to them as "co-tenants" or "occupants." (In fact, the marriage was clearly dissolving and the estranged wife had only just returned to the home for a brief period when the cops initiated the search at issue.)

brey said...

Terima kasih sudah mengizinkan saya untuk berkomentar disini, artikel anda sangat bagus sekali. izinkan kami untuk menshare nya ke web kami di jual obat pembesar penis
atas izinnya kami haturkan terima kasi, semoga situs anda dan kami semakin maju dan berada di peringkat pertama google.